Problems facing the maxis bank

Problems facing the maxis bankWe come into contact with plaque from the cradle to the grave. Indeed, organization regulate and dictate so some aspect of people lives, giving many of people somewhere to run for, entertaining them, when people be leisure and developing new product and operate for their enjoyment. Basically, it is non the same case for Maxi Bank, which got 30 branches and was established for over forty years. Their new tribunal and Project Manager John who actually replaced their accepted project manager, who has resigned, highlighted some serious organization barter such as communication problem among the provides, because of the high turnover since last eight months. The worst and unwieldy issue that John discovered is the lack of motivation and the production line dissatisf work on. Employers pot be made alert of concerns in the workplace that would normally go unspoken. Many serious issues in the workplace do not get discussed because they may be unco mfortable or difficult. By increasing the communication channels among staffs for littleon participation in the chemical group meeting, avoid isolation, motivation and the job satisfaction concept within a company, John can more efficiently re lap ups concerns, lower the staffs turnover, sum up employee satisfaction, find a way to solve Annies problem and more accurately assess issues and so on.ProblemsJohn the new Administ proportionalityn Department has observe some of problems that Maxis Bank switch, since he engaged in this company. Starting, with, the ugly supervision in Maxis Bank. Supervision is an extremely vital part of a workplace that intends to maximize its success potential. It naturally follows, consequently, that poor supervision in a workplace is among the primary obstacles to achieving potential successes by a business.Louis V. Imundo 1993, p 55. For Maxi Bank, a character supervisory team should be employed and trained to ensure the very finest results fr om their individual employee groups. These supervisors should have their consume support system, and their importance should be made very clear, to ensure the highest degree of productivity. Or, if the supervisor is not model plentiful, or is too overbearing, then the reaction from employees will only be fear, resentment, and displeasure in their work Dick Grote 2006 p. 45. The productivity will not be as good, and the employee turnover will increase.Often having some staffs in an organization, that came from divers(prenominal) department such as the case see lead to poor communications among them and . As in any relationship, communication is the key to a strong business relationship. This can be the relationship amid business and customer, or, equally as important, the internal relationships among polar employees within the company. Communication can be improved in virtually every workplace, no matter the industry or size. afterward all, it is the only way for informatio n to efficaciously spread through discover the business so that everybody can be informed to the degree that they required to properly achieve their goals. Luthans1998 p.145An new(prenominal) problem occurred in Maxis is there poor employee morale in the workplace. By facing this kind of problem, there is a high risk of employee burnout and boilers suit dissatisfaction. The cause of the poor employee moral can be structured as first a negatively charged event within the workplace, such as a firing, downsizing, or other dramatic and unwanted kind , or arguments or other forms of tension among staff members or between staff and management. Overwork, or a consistently heavy workload. The feeling of unappreciated or underappreciated for the work done, the conditions of the workplace. The rigid supervision involved in the work being done, and unsupportive or weak supervision that does not offer enough scuttlebutt or guidance Bennett. R, 1997 p.119This is an extremely expensive way t o do business because it leads to poor productivity, isolation and increase absences from work. The high absenteeism in Maxis Bank led to the non submission of their tasks on snip. Moreover, staffs in Maxis felt to be underworked, because correspond to Annie, she complained that her job is monotonous and repetitive.The staffs feel to be underworked for doing uncreative, and repetitive work, which always to high absenteeism and turnover as swell Giddens.A, 1971 p.23. .And lastly, the absence of leadership in the Maxis Bank created an issue within the staffs. People want to be manoeuvre by those they respect and who have a clear sense of direction. This type of person leads by dictatorial example and endeavors to foster a team environment in which all team members can extend their highest potential, twain as team members and as people. They encourage the team to reach team goals as efficaciously as possible, while excessively working tire slightly to strengthen the bonds amon g the various members. Kouzes, Posner, Barry Z. (1987).Good leaders argon made not born. If people have the desire and willpower, they can become an effective leader. Good leaders develop through a never ending surgical procedure of self-study, education, training, and experience Burns, 2010, p. 43. Basically, John should hire a good, effective and trust leader who can lead the staffs in a good way for the return of the Maxis BankReason why problems occur?For most part of the twentieth century, managers realized that if their employees were satisfied with their jobs, then that satisfaction would translate to working hard. Therefore, happy workers are productive workers. It is true that in the case of Maxis, Annie was not productive, since she claimed that she attended few interviews with other bank. Organizations with more satisfied employees tend to be more effective than organizations with few satisfied employees.Dissatisfied employees are more likely to miss work. Although th is is true, other factors in any case do dramatic event a role, for instance organizations that provide liberal macabre leave benefits encourage all their employees to bewilder sick days. Hence, satisfied employees have lower levels of turnover while dissatisfied employees have higher levels of turnover. Research also suggest that an important moderator of the satisfaction-turnover relationship is the employees level of mathematical process. For better performing employees, the level of satisfaction is less important in predicting turnover. When employees are dissatisfied with their jobs, theyll respond somehow. It is not easy to predict how exactly theyll respond. adept capability quit, another might responds by doing person-to-person work at the workplace, or may take leave and increase the absenteeism.Workers in any organization impoverishment something to keep them working. Most times the recompense of the employee is enough to keep him or her working for an organizati on. However, sometimes just working for salary is not enough for employees to stay at an organization. An employee must be motivated to work for a company or organization. If no motivation is present in an employee, then that employees quality of work or all work in general will deteriorate Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. Snyderman, B.B. 1959, p. 341. Basically, staffs in Maxis Bank are unmotivated and dis conform to that why particular issues in the Maxis arose. hallucination is one of the factor of unhappiness and isolation that workers in hardly feel when theirs deeds are not a relevant or important part of the workers lifes, that they do not really belong to the work to the work community health (Karl. M, 1971p.59).It is associated with feelings of discontent, isolation and futility. Alienation workers perceive themselves or uneffective and dominated. Work is seen as unrevealed to real life it becomes simply a means to achieve materials ends. Alienation has been observed most oft en on automated assembly lines where work is extremely repetitive and personal relations with others workers are difficult to establish. Great unhappiness can result from alienation indeed, it can adversely offer the workers mental or physical health. In the case of Maxis, John found that each staff is working in isolation and difficult to establish a relation either professional or friendship with others.2-Some theorists have define and explained the concept of motivation as a process that government note for an individuals intensity, direction, and persistence of reason toward attaining a goal. Many contemporary authors have also defined the concept of motivation. It has been defined as the psychological process that gives doings purpose and direction Kreitner. R, 1995 p. 44 a predisposition to stock in a purposive manner to achieve specific, unmet unavoidably Buford, Bedeian, Lindner, 1995, p. 56 an internal drive to satisfy an unsatisfied need Higgins, 1994, p. 78 and the will to achieve Bedeian, 1993, p. 675. Basically motivation is operationally defined as the inner force that drives individuals to accomplish personal and organizational goals.Why do we need motivated employees? The rejoinder is survival (Smith, 1994). make employees are needed in our rapidly changing workplaces. Motivated employees help organizations survive. Motivated employees are more productive. To be effective, managers need to understand what motivates employees within the context of the roles they perform Kovach, 1987, p.65. Of all the functions a manager performs, motivating employees is arguably the most complex. This is due, in part, to the fact that what motivates employees changes constantly Bowen , Radhakrishna, 1991, p. 62. For example, research suggests that as employees income increases, capital becomes less of a motivator Kovach, 1987, p. 72. Also, as employees get older, interesting work becomes more of a motivator. accord what motivated employees and how they were motivated was the focusing of many researchers following the publication of the Hawthorne Study results Terpstra, 1979,p. 98 The basis approaches that have led to our understanding of motivation are Maslows need-hierarchy speculation, Vrooms expectancy speculation, and Adams equity theory.According to Maslow, employees have five levels of need (Maslow, 1943), physiological, safety, fond, ego, and self- actualizing. Maslow argued that lower level needs had to be satisfied before the next higher level need would motivate employees. Herzbergs work categorized motivation into two factors motivators and hygienes (Herzberg, Mausner, Snyderman, 1959, p. 125. Motivator or intrinsic factors, such as achievement and recognition, produce job satisfaction. Hygiene or extrinsic factors, such as pay and job security, produce job dissatisfaction.Vrooms theory is based on the belief that employee effort will lead to performance and performance will lead to rewards Vroom, 1964, p. 150. R ewards may be either dictatorial or negative. The more cocksure the reward the more likely the employee will be highly motivated. Conversely, the more negative the reward the less likely the employee will be motivated.Adams theory states that employees strive for equity between themselves and other workers. Equity is achieved when the ratio of employee outcomes over inputs is equal to other employee outcomes over inputs Adams, 1965. p. 134Basically, the best motivational theory that suits the Maxis Banks case is the backing theory. This theory can be traced to the work of the pioneering behaviorist B.F. Skinner. It is considered a motivation theory as well as a learning theory. Reinforcement theory posits that motivated behavior occurs as a result of reinforces, which outcomes are resulting from the behavior that makes it more likely the behavior will occur again. This theory suggests that it is not prerequisite to study needs or cognitive processes to understand motivation, but that it is only necessary to examine the consequences of behavior. In documentation theory a combination of rewards and/or punishments is used to reinforce desired behavior or slake unwanted behavior. Behavior that is reinforced is likely to continue, but behavior that is not rewarded or behavior that is punished is not likely to be repeated. Skinner, B.F. Science and Human Behavior. 1953.The most important principle of reinforcement theory is, of course, reinforcement. Generally speaking, there are two types of reinforcement positive and negative. Positive reinforcement results when the occurrence of a valued behavioral consequence has the effect of strengthening the probability of the behavior being repeated. The specific behavioral consequence is called a reinforcer Iwata, B. A. (1987, p. 67. An example of positive reinforcement might be a salesperson that applies extra effort to meet a sales quota (behavior) and is then rewarded with a bonus (positive reinforcer). The go vernance of the positive reinforcer should make it more likely that the salesperson will continue to exert the necessary effort in the future. In the case of Maxis Bank, according to Annie affirmation she refused to handle extra job other than her current job scope. If the positive reinforce come into it for instance rewarded her with a reward, she would not refused to handle extra job and the level of the motivation will rise automatically.Rewards can therefore assume a number of different forms, though there are two main formsextrinsic rewards, which take the form of cash payments and oeuvrebenefits, like staff discounts,occupational, pensions,health insurance, andcompany cars andintrinsic rewardssuch asjob satisfaction, recognition, personal development, and the social status which may be attached to particular job roles.Negative reinforcement results when an undesirable behavioral consequence is withheld, with the effect of strengthening the probability of the behavior being re peated. Negative reinforcement is often mixed with punishment, but they are not the same. Punishment attempts to decrease the probability of specific behaviors negative reinforcement attempts to increase desired behavior. Thus, both positive and negative reinforcement have the effect of increasing the probability that a particular behavior will be learned and repeated Iwata, B. A. 1987, p. 68. An example of negative reinforcement might be a salesperson that exerts effort to increase sales in his or her sales land (behavior), which is followed by a decision not to reassign the salesperson to an undesirable sales route (negative reinforcer). The administration of the negative reinforcer should make it more likely that the salesperson will continue to exert the necessary effort in the future.Reinforcement theory suggests to managers that they can improve employees performance by a process of behavior modification in which they reinforce desired behaviors and punish undesired behavior .Moreover, for John case, reinforcement theory will be the best appropriate to motivate his 10 staffs, increase the desire behavior, or increase the probability of a behavior reoccurring. Consequently, both positive and negative reinforcement have the free weight of increasing the probability that a particular behavior will be educated and repetitive. For instance, in Maxis Bank, both positive and negative reinforcement will have the effect of modified or punished the undesirables behavior of the staffs such as the absenteeism, the high turnover, the work isolation and increase the desirable behavior for instance handling extra job, attend all the interviews with the others banks, if bonus or rewards and maybe motivation words are applied.3. root dynamicsis the study of groups, and also a general term for group processes Ringer, T. M. 2002 p 172. Relevant to the handle ofpsychology,sociology, andcommunication studies, agroupis two or more individuals who are connected to each ot her by social relationships.Because they interact and influence each other, groups develop a number of dynamic processes that calve them from a random collection of individuals. These processes include norms, roles, relations, development, need to belong, social influence, and cause on behavior. The field of group dynamics is primarily concerned with small group behavior. Bass, Bernard 1990, p. 31A group comes together to focus on finding general solutions or building a final project to the organization. This can be very effective to the project or solution because individuals in different roles in the workplace, different backgrounds and different experiences have a variety of points of view that they are able to contribute (Dimock, H.G.1993). Working in groups is often more efficient and motivates group members to achieve more in a certain period of time as group members motivate others to do their best and people often feel the need to be competitive (CSU 2009). Bringing out t he competitive nature in people focused toward a common goal can often be a very productive strategy.In the Maxis case, the organization got employees came from different departments, different roles lead different experiences, but the thing is there is not group team in Maxis Bank. Each employees work in isolation. Some staffs in Maxis Bank are very independent and choose to work alone rather than in groups. They feel that their best work comes from completing projects individually. (Burgess H. 2007).Dealing effectively with groups of people is a skill that will serve us in all areas of our lives. It can also be a challenge- because people as individuals tend to have their own ideas about how they relate to a group, and not all of these ideas work very well in practice. Theres a profound difference between a set of individuals and a cohesive group, and weve all felt that difference- where a group is tightly link up and conscious of itself, the group is vastly more capable than the sum of its parts. Where individual members are unconscious to the needs of the group, often the group is weaker than the sum of the individual members capabilities.Skinner, B.F. Science and Human Behavior. New York Macmillan, 1953.Iwata BA. Negative reinforcement in applied behavior analysis, pp. 67 68Buford, J. A., Jr., Bedeian, A. G., Lindner, J. R. (1995). Management in Extension (3rd ed.). Columbus, Ohio Ohio State University Extension. p. 56Terpstra, D. E. (1979). Theories of motivation borrowing the best. p. 98Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York Wiley. p. 150Bennett. R, 1997 Organisational behaviour, 3rd edition, pp.119Karl.M, 1967 The rise of the working class, p.59.Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. Snyderman, B.B. 1959, The want to Work p. 341Luthans1998 Organisation behaviour, 8th edition, p.145.Discipline Without Punishment Dick Grote 2006 p.45LeadershipJames MacGregor Burns, 2010, p. 43Kreitner, R. (1995), Management, Sixth Edition, p. 44 Boston Houghton Miffli n CompanyHiggins, J. M. (1994). The management challenge (2nd ed.). New York Macmillanp. 78Bedeian, A. G. (1993). Management (3rd ed.). New York Dryden Press. p. 675Kovach, K. A. (1987). What motivates employees? pp.65 72Bowen, B. E., Radhakrishna, R. B. (1991). patronage satisfaction p. 62Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work, p. 125Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in observational social psychology. p. 134Effective Supervisors Louis V. Imundo 1993 p.55Bass, Bernard (1989). StogdillsHYPERLINK http//www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/002901820X/bigdogsbowlofbis/ Handbook of Leadership A Survey of Theory and Research. New York gratis(p) Press.Bass, Bernard (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 18, p.31.Blake, Robert R. and Mouton, Janse S. (1985). The Managerial Grid III The Key to Leadership Excellence. Houston gulf Publishing Co.Bolman, L. and Deal, T. (1991). Reframing Organizations. San Francisco Jossey-Bass.Kouzes, James M. Posner, Barry Z. (1987). The Leadership Challenge. San Francisco Jossey-Bass.Lamb, L. F., McKee, K. B. (2004). Applied Public Relations Cases in Stakeholder Management. Mahwah, New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. RoutledgeBacon, S. B. (1988).The personal effects of racially homogeneous and heterogeneous Outward demarcation line groups on the self-report survey scores and drop out rates of minority students. Greenwich, CT Outward Bound USA.Ewert, A. (1992). Group development through existential education Does it happen?Journal of Experiential Education,15(2).Ewert, A., Heywood, J. (1991). Group development in the natural environment Expectations, outcomes, and techniques.Environment and Behavior,23, 592-615.Ewert, A. McAvoy. L. (2000).The effects of wilderness settings on organized groups A state of knowledge paper. In D. N. Cole S. F. McCool (Eds.)Proceed ings wild science in a time of change(pp. 13-26). Ogden, UT U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky draw Research Station.Kerr, P. J., Gass, M. A. (1995). A group development model for adventure education. In K. Warren, M. Sakofs, J. S. Hunt (Eds.)The theory of experiential education(pp. 285-296). Boulder, CO Association of Experiential EducationNeill, J. T., Dias, K. L. (2001). dangerous undertaking education and resilience The double-edged HYPERLINK http//wilderdom.com/abstracts/NeillDias2001AdventureEducationResilienceDoubleEdgedSword.htmsword.Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning,1(2), 35-42.Neill, J. T. (2002).Social support helps people grow.Horizons,17(Spring), 32-34.Neill, J. T., Dias, K. L. (c.2001).Challenge and support in Outward Bound The double-edged sword.Outward Bound International Newsletter,10(1).Peak Experiences (n.d.).Issues of importance in forming a team.Ringer, T. M. (2002).Group action The dynamics of groups in therapeutic, edu cational and corporate settings. p. 172